If it is broke, shouldn’t you fix it?

Of course, it’s one thing to believe that what we’re doing is working, it’s another thing to prove it.

Over four-fifths (82%) of respondents say they need to improve the link between marketing activity and increased revenue. A third need dramatic improvement (and this leaps to 57% for professional services). Yet attribution, to put it mildly, is a mess.

It’s not surprising. With the myriad of touchpoints over an extended sales cycle, determining what delivered revenue is hard. Was it the top-of-funnel content that got someone on your radar? Was it the live demo that provoked a trial? Was it an influencer saying the right thing at just the right time?

The attribution mu
We see this confusion when we look at how B2B marketers attempt to prove effectiveness.

a quarter use no attribution whatsoever. This increases to 40% of those in the construction industry and 30% in financial services. Surprisingly, as they’re normally the early adopters, tech also over indexes with 37% not even trying to attribute success. It is also more likely that there is no attribution in mid-market businesses than those in the enterprise space.

But what about those who are trying to make the link?

Many are using a combination of measures. Most commonly used is when a lead initially converts (ie a contact is created in the database) – employed by 45% of respondents. This is closely followed by last touch (44%) and first touch (37%). Under a third (31%) use any form of multi-touch attribution, whether evenly split or weighted.

Decisions and consequences

While this could be seen simply as a sign of marketers just getting started with the easy stuff first, the implications of what you choose are worth further examination.

Once marketing is tied to a particular form of attribution, it will inevitably skew their activity as they try to make the numbers. If, for example, you select initial conversion as your measure of choice, you will find yourself leaning towards tactics that fill the top of the funnel (or at least prop up the database).

Conversely, select last touch and you will probably focus more on the bottom of the funnel and sales support.

While no measure is perfect, it is only when you get to some form of multi-touch attribution that you can begin to take a more integrated approach, seeing which tactics have had an impact and which haven’t.

Attribution has become another part of the ever-exploding martech stack of course. There are now a range of players who are offering systems and solutions promising to do the heavy lifting for you. Looking across our respondents, almost 60% are using something. However, no system exceeds 10% market share – so it seems like no vendor has nailed it yet either.

Attribution is critical to proving marketing impact on revenue, but most B2B marketers are struggling to deliver meaningful insights.

The big question

If you are unable to align marketing activity to bottom-line revenue, how will you show marketing’s contribution to business success?

3 Things to do right now


If you are unable to align marketing activity to bottom-line revenue, how will you show marketing’s contribution to business success?


Begin making the move to some form of weighted multi-touch attribution – it won’t be perfect (especially in the early days) but it is better than simple guesswork and gut feel.


Explore how technology can help but go in with your eyes open – be careful of getting locked in to just one system in this fast-moving sector.